GridComply AI — Compliance, run by an agent
For utilitiesISOsTSOs

Compliance,
run by an agent.

The first autonomous AI agent for NERC compliance. It monitors your obligations 24/7, opens the tickets, schedules the work, and produces the audit record — under your team's approval. Not a dashboard. Not a copilot.

24/7 monitoring Auto-ticketing RSAW-ready audit Human approval gates
Same violation · GridComply AI vs. Manual

CIP-007 R2 patch window missed — SRV-CTRL-014 reaches day 36 of the 35-day window. Watch the same gap close two ways.

GridComply AI 0.0s
1DetectCVE feed + SIEM flag missing patch on SRV-CTRL-014
2DecideAgent classifies: high severity, auto-remediate, flag approval
3ExecuteTicket JIRA-4471 opened · window booked Tue 02:00 · ops notified
4AuditRSAW evidence packet generated & sealed
packet sealed · sha256 a91f…3e7c
Manual process Day 0
1DetectEngineer spots gap on next weekly SIEM review
2DecideEmail thread, severity debated across IT + ops
3ExecuteTicket filed by hand · window negotiated · crew scheduled
4AuditEvidence assembled manually for the RSAW binder

Same gap. ~18 seconds vs ~17 days — every step the agent did, your team would do by hand.

The problem

NERC compliance is still done by hand — and the stakes don't allow for it.

Compliance teams burn 40+ hours a week on operational work: checking systems, opening tickets, scheduling crews, writing reports. The tools they buy only visualize the gap. Humans still do every line of the work.

01

100% manual operations

Monitor SIEM, asset registries, and SCADA. Open tickets in Jira or ServiceNow. Schedule maintenance, coordinate crews, generate RSAW reports — every step, every day, by hand.

02

Existing tools are dashboards

GRC platforms show you the gap on a screen. You still ticket it, schedule it, and report it manually. About 20% of the time saved, at best — the operational load stays with your team.

03

Too high-stakes for spreadsheets

Statutory penalties reach $1.54M per day, per violation. CIP-007 patch management is among the most-violated standards. PRC-005 spans nine component-type tables. Manual tracking guarantees gaps.

$1B+

spent every year across the bulk power system on manual NERC compliance labor — roughly $600K per registered entity.

How it works

Detect. Decide. Execute. Audit.

A continuous loop running across every covered NERC standard — with human approval gates on the decisions that matter. The agent handles the volume; your people own the judgment calls.

01 / Monitor

Detect

Agents poll SIEM, asset registries, SCADA, CVE feeds and maintenance records 24/7. Every CIP-007 patch window and PRC-005 test interval, watched continuously.

02 / Reason

Decide

The agent classifies each gap by severity, deadline and risk. Routine items auto-execute. High-stakes calls escalate to a human approver with full context.

03 / Act

Execute

Opens a Jira/ServiceNow ticket with CVE, asset, deadline and recommended fix. Books the maintenance window at low-load time. Notifies ops via email or Slack.

04 / Prove

Audit

Every decision logged. RSAW-format evidence auto-generated. Full traceability for auditors — what was detected, who approved, when remediation closed.

Approval-gated by design. Any action that could affect grid reliability or skip a NERC requirement waits for a named human approver. The agent never guesses — it escalates.

What it watches

Wired into the eight systems your compliance actually lives in.

One agent engine reads across your operational stack — no rip-and-replace. New standards are configuration, not a rebuild: roughly two to three weeks per ruleset on the same engine.

SIEM
Security events, log integrity, access anomalies.
Asset Registry
BES Cyber Assets, ESP boundaries, device inventory.
SCADA Historian
Operational state and control-system telemetry.
CMMS
Maintenance records, test intervals, work orders.
IAM
Identity, access reviews, privileged-account drift.
Change Management
Baseline changes against authorized configurations.
CVE Feed
New vulnerabilities mapped to the 35-day patch window.
NetFlow
Network boundary traffic and ESP communications.
Standards encoded today: CIP-007 CIP-010 CIP-014 PRC-005 TOP-001 + 40 more, expanding to full NERC coverage

Why us

A different category — not a feature comparison.

Every player in the NERC space sells visibility. We sell execution. To match it, they would have to rebuild their core architecture — a 12 to 18 month head start.

Capability Dashboard tools GRC platforms GridComply AI
24/7 monitoringPartialPartialYes
Auto-create ticketsNoPartialYes
Auto-schedule maintenanceNoNoYes
Auto-generate RSAW reportsManualManualYes
Approval gates + audit trailPartialYes
Typical workload reduction~20%~25%Up to 90%
Moat 01

A regulatory engineering asset

40+ standards encoded as a working rules library — 12 to 18 months to rebuild regardless of capital. It compounds with every standard added.

Moat 02

Founder domain credibility

Built by someone who has lived NERC compliance, speaking the buyer's language — not a generalist GRC vendor bolting AI onto a dashboard.

Moat 03

Audit-defensible precedent

Each pilot earns regulatory precedent: evidence that an agent's output holds up in a NERC audit. That trust is hard to fast-follow.

Moat 04

Exclusive channel

Owners-Engineering relationships put the agent inside the advisory firms utilities already trust to shape their compliance programs.

The ask

Run a 90-day pilot on your real obligations.

Read-only to start, zero risk, on your CIP-007 and PRC-005 workload. We baseline your manual hours in week one and show you the reduction by week thirteen. You shape what we build.

Frontier AI decision engine · deployable on-prem or cloud · ayaz.khokhar@source3energy.com

GridComply AI

Ayaz Khokhar · Founder & CEO  ·  ayaz.khokhar@source3energy.com
Others show you the work. GridComply AI does the work.